<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for steroidtimes.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.steroidtimes.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.steroidtimes.com</link>
	<description>Your Online Steroid Newspaper</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Science of HGH Testing by Metaphysical One</title>
		<link>http://www.steroidtimes.com/science-of-hgh-testing/2010/comment-page-1#comment-608</link>
		<dc:creator>Metaphysical One</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 21:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steroidtimes.com/?p=1098#comment-608</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the good post once again, looking forward to the next one!

&lt;a href="http://www.abstroose.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Metaphysics&lt;/A&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the good post once again, looking forward to the next one!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.abstroose.com/" rel="nofollow">Metaphysics</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Get ripped on Wii? by zynga facebook</title>
		<link>http://www.steroidtimes.com/get-ripped-on-wii/2009/comment-page-1#comment-607</link>
		<dc:creator>zynga facebook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 21:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steroidtimes.com/?p=65#comment-607</guid>
		<description>hah a lot of of the observations readers make are kinda silly, on occasion i ponder whether they in fact read the content articles and content before writing or if perhaps they only look at the title of the article and come up with the first thing that comes to mind. in any case, it is actually enjoyable to read intelligent commentary every now and then compared to the identical, old oppinion vomit which i typically discover on the web</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hah a lot of of the observations readers make are kinda silly, on occasion i ponder whether they in fact read the content articles and content before writing or if perhaps they only look at the title of the article and come up with the first thing that comes to mind. in any case, it is actually enjoyable to read intelligent commentary every now and then compared to the identical, old oppinion vomit which i typically discover on the web</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vitamin D: Sea, Sun and Sex Drive by mori Goldlist</title>
		<link>http://www.steroidtimes.com/vitamin-d-sea-sun-and-sex-drive/2010/comment-page-1#comment-606</link>
		<dc:creator>mori Goldlist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 15:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steroidtimes.com/?p=1106#comment-606</guid>
		<description>Tsk Tsk...  There is a very fundamental flaw in the above review.
There are a number of studies that show that manufactured Vitamin D3 is not nearly as effective as the D3 made naturally by our body's reaction to sunlight.
You were correct in stating that tanning beds emit about 5% UVB to about 95% UVA but you failed to realize that that ratio is almost identical to that issued by teh sun.

Ergo... if sunlight is the best way to get the right D3 as well as enough of it, then tanning beds are the next best thing to the sun but offer the benefits of privacy, monitoring, and convenience. I predict that in a few short years there will be far more tanning beds in homes than hot tubs!

By the way... the sun (and therefore tanning beds) causes the body to produce roughly 20-25,000 IUs of D3. 

If either G-d or evolution (your choice) caused our body's to react to the sun in such a manner producing such a large amount of D3, then that is what we probably need.

The recommended dosage of 400 IU's of D3 (forget about the cheap substitute D2) was meant as the minimum that a small child needs in order to combat rickets. 

Over the last number of years there has been more and more evidence that D3 receptors are found on so many more of the cell in our organs that 400 IUs is just so far away from the necessary amounts. so... aim for 10-25,000 IUs daily and the only way you're going to get that is by exposure of most of our body to sunlight whether from the sun or tanning lamps.

Why didn't we hear about this until now? The medical and pharmaceutical mega-industry cannot afford to have people healthy... healthy people don't need pills or treatments and if suddenly a tremendous number of people started tanning for their D3, the industry would deflate like a burst balloon.

The medical and pharmaceutical mega-industry's raison d'etre is pure profit motivated. They are NOT in the health business, they are in the curing business and rely on us to become sick and in-firmed and at death's door... that's the way they want us!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tsk Tsk&#8230;  There is a very fundamental flaw in the above review.<br />
There are a number of studies that show that manufactured Vitamin D3 is not nearly as effective as the D3 made naturally by our body&#8217;s reaction to sunlight.<br />
You were correct in stating that tanning beds emit about 5% UVB to about 95% UVA but you failed to realize that that ratio is almost identical to that issued by teh sun.</p>
<p>Ergo&#8230; if sunlight is the best way to get the right D3 as well as enough of it, then tanning beds are the next best thing to the sun but offer the benefits of privacy, monitoring, and convenience. I predict that in a few short years there will be far more tanning beds in homes than hot tubs!</p>
<p>By the way&#8230; the sun (and therefore tanning beds) causes the body to produce roughly 20-25,000 IUs of D3. </p>
<p>If either G-d or evolution (your choice) caused our body&#8217;s to react to the sun in such a manner producing such a large amount of D3, then that is what we probably need.</p>
<p>The recommended dosage of 400 IU&#8217;s of D3 (forget about the cheap substitute D2) was meant as the minimum that a small child needs in order to combat rickets. </p>
<p>Over the last number of years there has been more and more evidence that D3 receptors are found on so many more of the cell in our organs that 400 IUs is just so far away from the necessary amounts. so&#8230; aim for 10-25,000 IUs daily and the only way you&#8217;re going to get that is by exposure of most of our body to sunlight whether from the sun or tanning lamps.</p>
<p>Why didn&#8217;t we hear about this until now? The medical and pharmaceutical mega-industry cannot afford to have people healthy&#8230; healthy people don&#8217;t need pills or treatments and if suddenly a tremendous number of people started tanning for their D3, the industry would deflate like a burst balloon.</p>
<p>The medical and pharmaceutical mega-industry&#8217;s raison d&#8217;etre is pure profit motivated. They are NOT in the health business, they are in the curing business and rely on us to become sick and in-firmed and at death&#8217;s door&#8230; that&#8217;s the way they want us!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mark McGwire comes clean about being dirty. by Cynthia</title>
		<link>http://www.steroidtimes.com/mark-mcgwire-comes-clean-about-being-dirty/2010/comment-page-1#comment-598</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 21:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steroidtimes.com/?p=1025#comment-598</guid>
		<description>I am so glad that  I found your blog 
				  Mark McGwire comes clean about being dirty. &#124; steroidtimes.com					. Fine contribution.  This is very up-to-date web blog. I think I will share it on Facebook. Thank you !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am so glad that  I found your blog<br />
				  Mark McGwire comes clean about being dirty. | steroidtimes.com					. Fine contribution.  This is very up-to-date web blog. I think I will share it on Facebook. Thank you !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HGH test leads to ban of rugby player by George Ratana</title>
		<link>http://www.steroidtimes.com/hgh-test-leads-to-ban-of-rugby-player/2010/comment-page-1#comment-593</link>
		<dc:creator>George Ratana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 03:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steroidtimes.com/?p=1091#comment-593</guid>
		<description>The world cup is only 6 months away. Thanks for the info as I am a football fanatic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The world cup is only 6 months away. Thanks for the info as I am a football fanatic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cheating for Success with Ultimate Fate by Matt Cahill</title>
		<link>http://www.steroidtimes.com/cheating-for-success-with-ultimate-fate/2009/comment-page-1#comment-573</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Cahill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steroidtimes.com/?p=985#comment-573</guid>
		<description>Enter your email address into the feedburner box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enter your email address into the feedburner box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mary Jane and the Bodybuilder by angelo212</title>
		<link>http://www.steroidtimes.com/mary-jane-and-the-bodybuilder/2009/comment-page-1#comment-438</link>
		<dc:creator>angelo212</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 09:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steroidtimes.com/?p=115#comment-438</guid>
		<description>Your funny dude. I have a problem believing that you gained 25 pounds and 2 inches are your arms in 5 months naturally. Unless you were a bodybuilder for years before and took some time off and came back this is not happening. And weed did it huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your funny dude. I have a problem believing that you gained 25 pounds and 2 inches are your arms in 5 months naturally. Unless you were a bodybuilder for years before and took some time off and came back this is not happening. And weed did it huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mary Jane and the Bodybuilder by Drew</title>
		<link>http://www.steroidtimes.com/mary-jane-and-the-bodybuilder/2009/comment-page-1#comment-379</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 19:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steroidtimes.com/?p=115#comment-379</guid>
		<description>pre-gaming works. I am a natural bodybuilder and have gained 2" on my arms and gained 25lbs in 5 months. People at the gym all accuse me of steroids  use because my:  results, focus and that my intensity is higher than their own by far and they themselves 'juice.' If your mindset is locked in on your workout before you smoke, then watch out for the animal that is going to be awakened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pre-gaming works. I am a natural bodybuilder and have gained 2&#8243; on my arms and gained 25lbs in 5 months. People at the gym all accuse me of steroids  use because my:  results, focus and that my intensity is higher than their own by far and they themselves &#8216;juice.&#8217; If your mindset is locked in on your workout before you smoke, then watch out for the animal that is going to be awakened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Deadly Nightshade Hits RX Market by Matt Cahill</title>
		<link>http://www.steroidtimes.com/deadly-nightshade-hits-rx-market/2009/comment-page-1#comment-325</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Cahill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steroidtimes.com/?p=1001#comment-325</guid>
		<description>From the comments posted about this article it seems that product might be intended to treat diarrhea. I guess my main question would then by has the treatment of diarrhea become such a problem that this drug combo really makes sense?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the comments posted about this article it seems that product might be intended to treat diarrhea. I guess my main question would then by has the treatment of diarrhea become such a problem that this drug combo really makes sense?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Deadly Nightshade Hits RX Market by Patrick Arnold</title>
		<link>http://www.steroidtimes.com/deadly-nightshade-hits-rx-market/2009/comment-page-1#comment-324</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Arnold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 17:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steroidtimes.com/?p=1001#comment-324</guid>
		<description>Just a guess but sounds like this would be an effective treatment for diarrhea.  nightshade contains belladonna alkaloids such as atropine.  These alkaloids are effective in treating diarrhea due to their anticholinergic action.  opium of course contains opium alkaloids such as morphine, and these also are very good for diarrhea.  Remember, many times the only diffrerence between a poison and a drug is the dose</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a guess but sounds like this would be an effective treatment for diarrhea.  nightshade contains belladonna alkaloids such as atropine.  These alkaloids are effective in treating diarrhea due to their anticholinergic action.  opium of course contains opium alkaloids such as morphine, and these also are very good for diarrhea.  Remember, many times the only diffrerence between a poison and a drug is the dose</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
